<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>andrew.pilsch.com &#187; cocktail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrew.pilsch.com/blog/tag/cocktail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrew.pilsch.com/blog</link>
	<description>science fiction, new media, technical communications, transhumanism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 19:58:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Falernum Throwdown</title>
		<link>http://andrew.pilsch.com/blog/2008/08/20/falernum-throwdown/</link>
		<comments>http://andrew.pilsch.com/blog/2008/08/20/falernum-throwdown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Pilsch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cocktail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[falernum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tiki]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrew.pilsch.com/blog/?p=124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those of you who know me, you&#8217;ve probably heard me prattle on endlessly about cocktail making (I don&#8217;t like &#8220;mixology&#8221;, as a word). Well, now it&#8217;s come to my blog, too: One of the things I really enjoy about cocktail mixing is how it&#8217;s like cooking but with even less margin for error. Essentially [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>For those of you who know me, you&#8217;ve probably heard me prattle on endlessly about cocktail making (I don&#8217;t like &#8220;mixology&#8221;, as a word).  Well, now it&#8217;s come to my blog, too:</p>

	<p>One of the things I really enjoy about cocktail mixing is how it&#8217;s like cooking but with even less margin for error.  Essentially you take three or four ingredients (or a dozen if you are making a tiki drink), shake them with ice, and strain into a chilled glass.  Yet, as you can learn when you start playing with those few ingredients, you can radically change the shape of a drink (which is why I&#8217;ve stopped ordering Manhattans at restaurants; it takes to long to explain to the wait staff what whiskey I want (with a few options), what vermouth I want, that I do want bitters, and that I don&#8217;t want a cherry or any cherry juice).  Recently, I decided to place an order with <a href="http://www.feebrothers.com">Fee Brothers</a>, inspired by <a href="http://www.kaiserpenguin.com/fee-brothers-syrup-and-bitter-tasting/" title="which is awesome">local cocktail superstar Kaiser Penguin&#8217;s account of their customer service</a>.  In addition to the bitters I was actually ordering (and the bitters they talked me into ordering), I decided to add a bottle of their <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falernum">falernum</a>. </p>

	<p>As you can see from the linked Wikipedia article, falernum is a spiced, rum and lime based syrup that is considered one of the great forgotten cocktail ingredients.  I&#8217;ve been making my own for a while now and my <a href="http://blog.beachbumberry.com/2008/03/29/an-ohanna-for-the-ohana/">third batch</a> (the recipe is from Chris Hannah of Arnaud&#8217;s French 75 in New Orleans) is something I am quite proud of.  So, I thought it would be fun to get a bottle of Fee&#8217;s syrup to try against my homemade product and to serve as a backup for the homemade.</p>

	<p>The bottles from Fee Brothers arrived in the mail yesterday, so I cracked open their falernum and whipped up two half recipes of Don the Beachcomber&#8217;s <a href="http://www.kaiserpenguin.com/test-pilot-revisited/">Test Pilot</a>, using my falernum in one and Fee&#8217;s in the other. </p>

	<p>The difference between the two drinks was apparent before Shawna and I had even tried them: my falernum produced a dark brown cocktail and the one with Fee&#8217;s was more of a copper color.  This made sense as mine is made with evaporated cane juice while Fee&#8217;s isn&#8217;t.  When we tasted them, they were entirely different beverages.  Mine produced a drink that had much more depth to it and foregrounded a lot of the smokiness of the alcohol from the rum and the Clement Creole Shrubb I used in place of the Cointreau.  The Fee Brother&#8217;s falernum tasted more openly citrus-y, highlighting the orange of the Shrubb and brightness of the limes.  This makes sense as, tasting them straight, the Fee Brother&#8217;s syrup foregrounds the lime flavor with spice notes backing things up.  Mine, on the other hand, is almost good enough to drink straight, with a heavy depth emerging from the coffee beans and with the lime hitting the palate later in the tasting.  I think this played out in both of the drinks.</p>

	<p>I hope this discussion highlights why I&#8217;m so interested in cocktail making.  By changing the half ounce of falernum from one source to another (in a 3.75 ounce drink), I radically changed the drinking experience (also, I&#8217;m not entirely sure which I liked more).  Nonetheless, I think this calls for more experimentation.</p>

	<p>Image Credit: <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/melintur/2398768428/">Falernum Infusion</a> by <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/melintur">Elenadan</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andrew.pilsch.com/blog/2008/08/20/falernum-throwdown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

