<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>andrew.pilsch.com &#187; anger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrew.pilsch.com/blog/tag/anger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrew.pilsch.com/blog</link>
	<description>science fiction, new media, technical communications, transhumanism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 19:58:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>This Post Might Be a Bit of Rant</title>
		<link>http://andrew.pilsch.com/blog/2008/06/04/this-post-might-be-a-bit-of-rant/</link>
		<comments>http://andrew.pilsch.com/blog/2008/06/04/this-post-might-be-a-bit-of-rant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Pilsch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrew.pilsch.com/blog/2008/06/04/this-post-might-be-a-bit-of-rant/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been working on the design of this blog for the last few days (I probably should have been working on writing content, instead, but that&#8217;s beside the point). While I&#8217;ve finally gotten WordPress working the way I want, it hasn&#8217;t been a fun process. I realize that I ask a lot of software, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;ve been working on the design of this blog for the last few days (I probably should have been working on writing content, instead, but that&#8217;s beside the point).  While I&#8217;ve finally gotten <a href="http://wordpress.org/">WordPress</a> working the way I want, it hasn&#8217;t been a fun process.  I realize that I ask a lot of software, but sometimes I really wonder: is trying to use the fullest possible set of features so much to ask?</p>

	<p>I&#8217;ve been trying to get posting via email to work, for quite a while. Well, actually I&#8217;m trying to get it working again.  I migrated my domain tools to <a href="http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/var_1c.html">Google Apps</a> and suddenly couldn&#8217;t post via email anymore.  Why, you ask?  Well, it turns out that WordPress&#8217;s out of the box post via email doesn&#8217;t work with the <span class="caps">SSL</span> used on Gmail&#8217;s servers.  Does it say this anywhere in the <a href="http://codex.wordpress.org/Blog_by_Email">documentation</a>?  No.  No it doesn&#8217;t.  The only hint I had was this mention: &#8220;<a href="http://www.economysizegeek.com/?page_id=395">Postie</a> supports posting to categories, automatic removal of email signatures, POP3/IMAL (<em>sic</em>) (+SSL) and more.&#8221;   What does that mean?</p>

	<p>I assumed it meant that Postie was better at handling email than WordPress&#8217;s bare bones implementation.  What it <b>actually</b> means is that WordPress doesn&#8217;t support <span class="caps">SSL</span> (also that WordPress doesn&#8217;t proofread things).  I suppose I could log in and fix it (it is a wiki after all), but it seems sort of embarrassing that this software has such poor documentation.<br />
Additionally, the WordPress plugin that does work with <span class="caps">SSL</span> servers, like Gmail&#8217;s, <a href="http://www.economysizegeek.com/?page_id=395">Postie</a>, ships with syntax errors (someone didn&#8217;t close all their parentheses).  Additionally, the configuration menu is an over-designed nightmare that contains a number of spelling errors.</p>

	<p>Further, I&#8217;m having trouble finding wordpress plugins to do things that <a href="http://www.wordpress.com">WordPress&#8217;s hosting service</a> has by default.  How do I include <a href="http://www.del.icio.us">delicious</a> updates in my sidebar (like most wordpress.com blogs)?  Well, I installed <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/delicious-cached/">del.icio.us cached++</a>, but it drops a &#8220;<!-- more -->&#8220; tag at the bottom of its sidebar widget.  Again, being open source, I <strong>could</strong> fix it myself, but I&#8217;m not your f***ing bug checker.</p>

	<p>Adding on to this: <a href="http://iwphone.contentrobot.com/">iWPhone</a> doesn&#8217;t work at all.  I&#8217;m <strong>so</strong> sick of fighting with WordPress&#8217;s crappy documentation, lack of good plugins, and non-working software.  I&#8217;d say that this was like using Linux back in the good old 2.0-kernel days, but even then most of the stuff worked.</p>

	<p>Part of my problem, I think is how hard it is to find things about WordPress widgets and plugins.  Searching their <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/">plugin repository</a> is a vague description filled crap shot, at best.  Admittedly, there are some really good plugins out there: <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/croppr/">croppr</a>, for instance, is great.</p>

	<p>I think the issue I&#8217;m having with WordPress lies in a lack of focus on the part of WordPress w/r/t their audience.  Most WordPress users, I&#8217;m guessing, are not people like me.  They want a blog and they want it now.  Cool, fine.  For those people, the template writing documentation (which treats like a child) is probably okay.  I would imagine that I would have trouble writing a WordPress theme if I didn&#8217;t already know <span class="caps">PHP</span>.  Let&#8217;s assume, though, that I do know <span class="caps">PHP</span> and have been using it for years.  Also, let&#8217;s assume that I want to try to do something novel with WordPress.  Why shouldn&#8217;t I have access to all the constants that WordPress defines?  Why shouldn&#8217;t I have a list of global variables?  Why can&#8217;t I access post information without printing it to the screen by default?  I realize that I could find all of this stuff out (and have via much <a href="http://www.google.com">Google</a> usage), but as it is, it&#8217;s easier for me to start an <a href="http://us.php.net/ob_start">output buffering</a> every time I want to get the post&#8217;s title loaded into memory.</p>

	<p>My point is this: WordPress is a really amazing blogging system (esp. given that it&#8217;s free), but due to the assumption that most power user&#8217;s are not going to be extending it (or that power user&#8217;s aren&#8217;t lazy), doing anything with WordPress outside of posting in the default theme is a frustrating nightmare.  I wonder, though, if I&#8217;m the only person with this problem, as I&#8217;ve had a lot of trouble just finding information in Google.  Hmmm. </p>

	<p><strong>Update</strong>: Posting this item, Postie decided, first, not to work because I didn&#8217;t configure a feature that I wasn&#8217;t using (but can&#8217;t turn off).  The error message was wonderfully vague, so I ended up going into the source code, again, via <em>vim</em> and commenting out a bunch of crap.</p>

	<p>Image Credit: <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/nesster/2216511038/">&#8220;<span class="caps">RANT</span>, This Way&#8221;</a> by <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/nesster/">Nesster</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andrew.pilsch.com/blog/2008/06/04/this-post-might-be-a-bit-of-rant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

