Monthly Archives:

Archive for May 2008

Header Image For This Post
May14 14:35

Towards a Theory of Classic Rock

Tagged:
No Comments

An assertion: white teenagers continue to listen Led Zeppelin and feel
subversive, as they have for the last 40 years. Why?

Largely, I’m interested, here, in addressing the continuance of
classic rock as a radio
format and a viable musical option when other (arguably better) forms
of music have dropped out of the popular teenage imagination (think
punk, disco, post punk, new wave, and hair metal (although I wouldn’t
argue that as better (although Quiet Riot is more fun)).
Specifically, though, I’m interested in why one band, Led Zeppelin, is
regarded as the paragon of artistic craft, rock&roll rebellion, raw
sexuality, and unassailable anti-commercialism when there are other
bands that are provably better at any of these features. Why Led
Zeppelin?

Continue Reading »

Header Image For This Post
May05 10:05

Openness (an end of Web2.0) or Why You Should Be Reading _Limbo_

Tagged:
No Comments

I just finished reading Bernard Wolfe’s science fiction
novel, Limbo,
which, as the review I linked to says, is “one of those novels that
only five people or so read a year but all five of them declare it
brilliant.” I wonder who the other four are? Seriously, though, the
fact that this book is way out of print is criminal (also, as the copy
I read was a moldy first edition from Rutgers, I now have to clean up
the pieces of the book’s binding that have been deposited all over my
house). It has to rank as one of the strangest novels I’ve ever read. Large chunks of the book are rants about
Freud or
Weiner or
Korzybski. It has some truly
strange sex scenes and some rather embarrassing misogyny. The book is
largely a consideration of cybernetics and their implications for
re-making man. N. Katherine Hayles has a pretty good essay, from How We Become Posthuman
on Limbo. There are a lot of things that I could say about this
book (and will, I’m sure), especially in light of the fact that Wolfe
considers the possibility of physically remaking the human to be a
losing proposition and that true transcendence can only result from a
wetware upgrade.

As I was reading Wolfe’s novel, I saw some stuff on some blogs that
relates: in this post on Digital Inspiration,
there’s a discussion of whether or not the failure of
Spresent and
Slideaware represents the beginning of the
end of Web2.0. I don’t think we can make that claim so quickly, and,
probably, such claims are a result of the cave-in that resulted in the
end of Web1.0 (why does no one ever talk about that?). What
interested me about this post is the question of what would actually
constitute the end of Web2.0.

Continue Reading »