Daily Archives:

Archive for January 29th, 2007

Header Image For This Post

Addendum

No Comments

I realize that people reading my previous post (about music) will, perhaps, find it odd. I know that I don’t listen to “mainstream” music, by any stretch of the imagination, but I find my independent music listening has become a lot safer, of late. I’ve really been digging a lot more indie rock/pop and a lot of the post-rock, psych, noise, and metal that used to be my meta-indie cred. Anyway, I like making a conscious effort to getting back to more outsider stuff.

It’s similar to the realization I came to that my cooking and eating habits were getting to safe. I made a promise, to myself, to eat more organ meats and stuff like that. My mom thought I was insane: “you’re already one of the most adventurous eaters I know.” Same with my music taste, but I feel like i could go so much further, I guess.

Continue Reading »

Header Image For This Post

Divergences

No Comments

I’m faced with a fork in the metaphoric road, today. Despite the fact that I was concerned with being “so busy” this semester, I find I have a lot more unstructured time this semester than, really, ever before. I think part of it is how much more reading I’ve been getting done since Shawna and I have started combining studying and hanging out. The problem, though, is that I’m done with my reading for the week and it’s Monday morning (this isn’t entirely true; I’ve not actually yet read Structures of Scientific Revolutions, but this will be reading number four (number two for this year!)). I was reading Fred’s book on Adorno (Late Marxism: Adorno or the Persistence of the Dialectic (a book so good they titled it thrice!)), but when he got into a detailed analysis of Kant’s and Hegel’s competing influence on Adorno’s understanding of the thing, I got run over by Teutonic philosophy. I’m picking at Jean Baudrillard’s Fragments, as well, but it’s a book that can, really, only be picked at (not being composed of an argument and all). Anyway, as I see it, I can either do my taxes or start reading The Dialectic of Enlightenment (based on my comments last week on Adorno and something Fred had to say about “The Culture Industry,” I’‘m thinking that I need to give that book another chance). Both of these smell specifically un-fun. While I suppose I could just laze about the house all day, watching movies and eating bonbons, I feel sort of bad. Everyone else I know is insanely busy and pressured and stuff. All I really have to do today is walk down to the mailbox and mail this month’s bills (I also have to go teach at 2:30, but I have a feeling that I’m really, really going to forget to do this). Anyway, I think I’m going to go wander around the house and wait for inspiration. Having nothing to do is so much work, damn!

Image Credit: Divergence by wauter de tuinkabouter

Continue Reading »

Header Image For This Post

“New” Music

No Comments

The newest edition of Resonant Frequency over at Pitchfork is a really interesting read. Not only does it respond to a Langdon Winner essay (who was, as you may recall, the star of my last posting), but it mirrors something I’ve been concerned with lately. I’ve noticed that since I’ve graduated from Gatech, I’ve not been as adventurous in my music listening as I used to be. I remember recently listening to a recent Pruient release and finding that it gave me a headache (which has always been the case with Pruient, but I used to, at least, give them a chance). I’ve been avoiding Wolf Eyes, Sunburned Hand of Man, and anything labeled “psych” recently. I think part of the reason is that music is no longer a project for me, to borrow the terms from the PFM column. Given the fact that I spend so much time in deep analysis of texts, films, and other social phenomenon, I can’t dedicate as much time to listening to complex music, I think. Rather, I want music to be a space of relaxation, something I can do to unwind. That said, I decided to turn off the Junior Boys’ album, upon reading that column, and spend some more time with the record that was probably my favorite of last year: Nachtmystium’s Instinct:Decay. While this isn’t as challenging as some of the stuff I used to spend considerable time with as an undergraduate, it’s nice to listen to music that is a little more difficult to summarize, explain, or love.

At the same time, I totally get Mark Richardson’s point about records and how they grow your ability to hear music. I put on Fizheuer Zieheuer yesterday while Shawna and I were studying. Despite the rather boring nature of the track (it’s more or less polka-house for forty minutes), something about it had appealed to me. When it came on after Philip Glass’s Solo Piano, I think things clicked. Ricardo Villalobos’s track has more in common with John Adam’s “The Chairman Dances” than it does with dance music. I’m getting this record, now, I think. I’m also interested to get back into some of the rather difficult German tech house I was listening to earlier in the year, in light of how I now “get” it’s relationship to the minimalist classical tradition.

Continue Reading »